Recitation Program Based Multirepresentation & Feedback to Improve Students’ Mastery of Concepts and Learning Outcomes on Dynamic Fluid Materials

Briliantama Akbar Taufiq, Arif Hidayat, Sutopo Sutopo

Abstract


This study aims to identify the improvement of students' concept mastery and learning outcomes based recitation program accompanied by multi-representation and feedback about dynamic fluid. The topic raised in this study is about dynamic fluids. The pretest and posttest were used to measure students' learning outcomes using the same instrument. Meanwhile, students' conceptual mastery was measured using multiple-choice questions based on multi-representations during the formative assessment. This research and development refers to the research and development (R&D) method by referring to the 4-D model with stages namely Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate which was conducted on 36 students of SMA Negeri 3 Magetan who were taking fluid dynamics material. The validation results by material experts showed that the developed recitation program had an average percentage of 3.58 (very valid), from media experts 3.46 (very valid), and validation of multi-representation questions and feedback by experts 3.90 (very valid). Thus, the overall average of the recitation program assessment results by experts was categorized as valid. The developed recitation program received a very good response from students. This can be seen from the average student response of 97.2% (very good). The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference in students who used the recitation program having a concept mastery level of 80.9% which was higher than students who did not use the recitation program which was only 54.9%. Based on the validation results from experts, the product in the form of an apprenticeship-based recitation program is very valid for use in the learning process. The results showed that students' conceptual mastery improved significantly with the N-gain of 0.29. The number of problem and multi-contexts problem are the factors causing the success of the recitation program in improving students' conceptual understanding.

Keywords


recitation program; multirepresentation & feedback; dynamic fluid; concept mastery; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, D., Retnaningrum, E., Parinussa, J. D., & Kartika, I. M. (2023). Curriculum Development in Indonesia from a Historical Perspective.

Afwa. R. S., Laili, I., Sutopo., & Latifah, E. (2016). Deep Learning Question untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 434-447.

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Pembelajaran, PT Rosdakarya.

Aprita, D. F., Supriadi, B., & Prihandono, T. (2018). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Fluida Dinamis Menggunakan Four Tier Test Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(3), 315-321.

Asyhari, A., & Silvia, H. (2016). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berupa Buletin Dalam Bentuk Buku Saku Untuk Pembelajran IPA Terpadu. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 5(1), 1-13.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 10(2).

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 11(2).

Febryanti, A. D., & Taqwa, M. R. A. (2021). Pengembangan Program Resitasi Berbasis Web dengan Multirepresentasi pada Materi Kinematika. Jurnal Geliga Sains, 9(1), 1–11.

Koenig, K. M., Endorf, R. J., & Braun, G. A. (2007). Effectiveness of different tutorial recitation teaching methods and its implications for TA training. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 3(1).

Kustusch, M. B. (2016). Assessing the impact of representational and contextual problem features on student use of right-hand rules. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 12(1).

Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Changes in students’ problem-solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich, multifaceted problems. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 5(2).

Oliveira, P. C. & Oliveira, C. G. (2013). Using Conceptual Questions to Promote Motivation and Learning in Physics Lectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 417-424.

Pratama, N. D. S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Web-Based Assessment on Student’s Understanding of Concepts on Equilibrium and Rotation Dynamics. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 247–25.

Purwanto, M. N. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. PT Rosdakarya.

Rahmawati, S., Kusairi, S., & Sutopo. (2019). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Yang Belajar Materi Momentum dan Impuls Berbasis Scientific Approach Disertai Formative Assessment Berbantuan WEB. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 3(1), 1–6.

Razali, R., Sundana, L., & Ramli, R. (2023). Curriculum Development in Higher Education in Light of Culture and Religiosity: A Case Study in Aceh of Indonesia. International Journal of Society Culture and Language, 12(1), 39-55.

Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., & Hidayat, A. (2017). Deskripsi Penggunaan Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membangun Free-Body Diagrams (FBDs). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online 5(1), 52–58.

Ryan, Q., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). “Computer problem-solving coaches for introductory physics: Design and usability studies,” Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 12(1).

Supriadi, S., Suparno, S., Maksum, H., & Lapisa, R. (2020). Developing Energy Conversion Teaching Material based on Discovery Learning Model through Scientific Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(3), 114-124.

Sutopo, Jayanti, ida bagus, & Wartono. (2016). Efektivitas Program Resitasi Berbasis Komputer Untuk. 111–119.

Lin, S. Y., & Singh, C. (2011). Using Isomorphic Problems to Learn Introductory Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2): 1–16.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Washinton DC: National Center for Improvement Educational System.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v10i6.25892

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Briliantama Akbar Taufiq

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License