Email this article 
Analysis of Student Engangement and Perceptions of Community of Inquiry (CoI)-based Blended Learning in The Chemical Separation Subject on Chromatography
Abstract
Learning in higher education has often been conducted solely through face-to-face, teacher-centered approaches. Implementing Community of Inquiry (CoI)-based blended learning in chromatography is crucial as it offers students a novel learning experience. This pre-experimental study, utilizing a one-group pretest-posttest design, aimed to describe students’ perceptions of CoI-based blended learning in chromatography. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising 34 statements. The results indicated that students had a neutral perception of CoI-based blended learning. While a community of inquiry has been established, it has not yet reached its full potential, as students have not fully experienced social presence in the learning process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Nincarean A/L Eh Phon, D., Abdullah, A., ... & Baba, S. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09941-z
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27, 531–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Asalla, L. K., Maria, N., & Hannesto, R. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan CoI framework pada pembelajaran online terhadap peningkatan pemahaman (subkategori cognitive presence) mahasiswa. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 5(1), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v5i1.2614
Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 9–21.
BakarNordin, A., & Alias, N. (2013). Learning outcomes and student perceptions in using of blended learning in history. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.375
Bencheva, N. (2010). Learning styles and e-learning face-to-face to the traditional learning. Научни Трудове На Русенския Университеt, 49(3.2), 63–67. https://conf.uni-ruse.bg/bg/docs/cp10/3.2/3.2-11.pdf
Booth, N. (2023). Formative assessment in England: Multi-site case-studies exploring the effects of using an audio device during the Key Stage 3 group composing process (Doctoral dissertation, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK). Retrieved from https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/14728/
Castro-Rodríguez, M. M., Marín-Suelves, D., López-Gómez, S., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. (2021). Mapping of scientific production on blended learning in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(9), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090494
Fitriana, N. (2012). Penerapan pembelajaran kimia dengan model blended learning mata kuliah pemisahan kimia materi kromatografi pada mahasiswa jurusan kimia di Universitas Negeri Malang (Master thesis). Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Freeman, M. W., Grimes, L. W., & Holliday, J. R. (2000). Increasing access to learning with hybrid audio-data collaboration. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 112–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.3.3.112
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Hidalgo, P. (2010). Face to face vs online professional development? Do both! The power of the blended model. Chicago, IL: Math Solutions.
Kumar, A., Krishnamurthi, R., Bhatia, S., Kaushik, K., Ahuja, N. J., Nayyar, A., & Masud, M. (2021). Blended learning tools and practices: A comprehensive analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 85151–85197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844
Link, L., & Wagner, D. (2009). Computer-mediated communication in virtual learning communities. In P. Zaphiris & C. S. Ang (Eds.), Human Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 316–322). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1039
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Pay, B. (2016). Pupil-Pupil Talk: Does the Thinking Together Programme enhance pupil-pupil talk within the classroom?. The STeP Journal: Student Teacher Perspectives, 3(2), 14–23. http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/2463/
Peno, K. (2021). Developing online teaching skills: A self‐directed approach. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2021(169), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20418
Riyadi, B. (2014). Pengaruh tipe strategi pembelajaran blended learning (synchronous versus asynchronous) dan tingkat motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia). Retrieved from https://repository.um.ac.id/63629/
Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Sartika, D. (2020). Effect of the community of inquiry (CoI) learning model and learning style towards social skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.569
Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the community of inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 168, 104193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193
Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology. In E. Abu-Taieh, A. El Mouatasim, & I. H. Al Hadid (Eds.), Cyberspace (pp. 27–38). London, UK: IntechOpen.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
Unger, S., Simpson, C., Lecher, A. L., & Goudreau, S. B. (2022). Student perceptions of hybrid courses in higher education. Online Learning Journal, 26(4), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.2939
Wahyu, A., & Bagus, E. (2020). Persepsi mahasiswa prodi pendidikan IPA Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari terhadap pembelajaran kimia dasar berbasis blended learning. Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya (JB&P), 7(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.29407/jbp.v7i1.14798
Wiratomo, Y., & Mulyatna, F. (2020). Use of learning management systems in learning efforts during a pandemic. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JoMP), 1(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v1n2.p62-71
Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1016300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016300
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Vocational Education Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
